AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Compared 2 processors: AMD Ryzen 7 260, vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Ryzen 7 260 and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen 7 260
1780
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
AMD Ryzen 7 260
16387
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen 7 260
106
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
124
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen 7 260
930
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
1125
PassMark
Integer Mathn/a83.2 GOps/s
Floating-Point Mathn/a105.6 GOps/s
Prime Number Searchn/a350 M primes/s
Random String Sortn/a41.8 M strings/s
Data Encryptionn/a26.7 GB/s
Data Compressionn/a346.8 MB/s
Physicsn/a3055 frames/s
Extended Instructionsn/a289 M matrices/s
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen 7 260
2521
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
AMD Ryzen 7 260
11816
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
n/a
File Compressionn/a1350 MB/s
Clang Compilationn/a75.9 KLines/s
HTML5 Browsern/a432.9 pages/s
PDF Renderingn/a446.5 MP/sec
Text Processingn/a289.4 pages/s
Background Blurn/a66 frames/s
Photo Processingn/a152 frames/s
Ray Tracingn/a26.2 MP/sec

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
AMD Ryzen 7 260
n/a
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
281.68

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 218.8 PPW 675.9 PPW
PassMark CPU / W n/a 1358.6 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 17.2 PPW 45 PPW
Blender / W n/a 11.27 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Intel
Announced January, 7, 2025 January, 5, 2026
Type Laptop use Laptop use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 4 (Hawk Point) Panther Lake
Model number n/a 358H
Integrated GPU Radeon 780M Arc B390

Processor

Performance cores
Cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Frequency 3.8 GHz 1.9 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) 5.1 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficiency cores
Coresn/a12
Threadsn/a12
Frequencyn/a1.5 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo)n/a3.7 GHz
General
Cores count816
Threads count1616
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier38x19x
L1 cache64 KB/core192 KB/core
L2 cache1000 KB/core2560 KB/core
L3 Cache16 MB total18 MB total
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Package

Transistor count 25 billion n/a
Process tech. 4 nm 2 nm
Power (TDP) 35-54 W 15-25 W
Max TDP (Boost) n/a 80 W
Socket FP8 FCBGA2540
Critical temp. 100 °C 100 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type - LPDDR5X-7500
- DDR5-5600
LPDDR5X-9600
Max Size 256 GB 96 GB
Channels 2 2
ECC support No No
Max memory bandwidth n/a 153.6 GB

Other

PCIe Version 4.0 5.0
Max PCIe Lanes 20 12

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra X7 358H the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below