Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core 3 N355
20
out 100
VS
34
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Celeron N5095, vs Intel Core 3 N355. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 12.8 GOps/s | 34.6 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 8.2 GOps/s | 23 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 14 M primes/s | 28 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 7.6 M strings/s | 15.6 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 3.1 GB/s | 8.5 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 54.2 MB/s | 122.2 MB/s |
| Physics | 288 frames/s | 641 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 15 M matrices/s | 61 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 161.4 MB/s | 461.2 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 14.2 KLines/s | 36.5 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 48.7 pages/s | 120.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 62.7 MP/sec | 154.8 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 97.4 pages/s | 157.4 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 4.88 frames/s | 24.2 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 8.05 frames/s | 41.5 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 2.37 MP/sec | 7.33 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 94.2 PPW | 571.2 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 270.3 PPW | 1165.6 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | n/a | 37.1 PPW |
| Blender / W | 1.18 PPW | n/a |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | January, 1, 2021 | January, 3, 2023 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Jasper Lake | n/a |
| Model number | N5095 | 3-N355 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | UHD Graphics (32EU) |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | n/a |
| Threads | 4 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | n/a |
| Cores | n/a | 8 |
| Threads | n/a | 8 |
| Frequency | n/a | 0.1 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | n/a | 3.9 GHz |
| Cores count | 4 | 8 |
| Threads count | 4 | 8 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20x | 39x |
| L1 cache | n/a | 96 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 384 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB total | 6 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 15 W | 9 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | n/a | 15 W |
| Socket | BGA-1338 | BGA-1264 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR4-2933 - LPDDR4x-2933 |
- DDR5-4800 - DDR4-3200 - LPDDR5-4800 |
| Max Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| PCIe Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 8 | 9 |
| Tech | n/a | - Compute: AVX-VNNI, CLMUL, SHA - Performance: EIST, TBT 2.0 - Virtualization: VT-d, VT-x - Security: RDRAND, SGX, TXT |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core 3 N355 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
