Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
53
out 100
VS
79
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core 5 210H, vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 65.6 GOps/s | 157.3 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 48.5 GOps/s | 196.3 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 54 M primes/s | 449 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 25.1 M strings/s | 77 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 13 GB/s | 48.7 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 231.2 MB/s | 624.8 MB/s |
| Physics | 1081 frames/s | 3093 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 142 M matrices/s | 485 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 941.5 MB/s | 1480 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 67.4 KLines/s | 216.2 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 244.4 pages/s | 435.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 265.6 MP/sec | 545.5 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 225 pages/s | 344.8 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 46.8 frames/s | 78.6 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 107 frames/s | 156.4 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 15.5 MP/sec | 46.2 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 222.2 PPW | 371.8 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 436.2 PPW | 1027.3 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 14.2 PPW | 40.4 PPW |
| Blender / W | n/a | 6.54 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | January, 6, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | 210H | 275HX |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48EU) | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 3.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Cores count | 8 | 24 |
| Threads count | 12 | 24 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 22x | 27x |
| L1 cache | 80 KB/core | 112 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB total | 36 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 35-45 W | 45-55 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | 160 W |
| Socket | BGA-1744 | FCBGA-2114 |
| Critical temp. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR5-5200 - DDR4-3200 - LPDDR5-5200 - LPDDR5x-5200 - LPDDR4x-4267 |
DDR5-6400 |
| Max Size | 96 GB | 192 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 24 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
