Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505
53
out 100
VS
29
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core 5 210H, vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 65.6 GOps/s | 14.9 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 48.5 GOps/s | 9.2 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 54 M primes/s | 19 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 25.1 M strings/s | 6.8 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 13 GB/s | 3 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 231.2 MB/s | 55.9 MB/s |
| Physics | 1081 frames/s | 371 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 142 M matrices/s | 42 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 941.5 MB/s | 255.8 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 67.4 KLines/s | 16.5 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 244.4 pages/s | 63.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 265.6 MP/sec | 83.7 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 225 pages/s | 117.8 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 46.8 frames/s | 14.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 107 frames/s | 38.5 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 15.5 MP/sec | 2.96 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 222.2 PPW | 190.9 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 436.2 PPW | 345.7 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 14.2 PPW | n/a |
| Blender / W | n/a | 1.35 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | October, 17, 2020 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake |
| Model number | 210H | 7505 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48EU) | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | n/a |
| Threads | 4 | n/a |
| Frequency | 1.6 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 3.6 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 8 | 2 |
| Threads count | 12 | 4 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 22x | 20x |
| L1 cache | 80 KB/core | 96 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 1256 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB total | 4 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 35-45 W | 15 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | n/a |
| Socket | BGA-1744 | BGA-1449 |
| Critical temp. | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR5-5200 - DDR4-3200 - LPDDR5-5200 - LPDDR5x-5200 - LPDDR4x-4267 |
- DDR4-3200 - LPDDR4x-3733 |
| Max Size | 96 GB | 64 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core 5 210H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
