Intel Core i5 12450HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
48
out 100
VS
73
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core i5 12450HX, vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 57.2 GOps/s | 83.4 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 43.1 GOps/s | 106.9 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 54 M primes/s | 340 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 23.3 M strings/s | 38.3 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 12.1 GB/s | 24.7 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 219.7 MB/s | 311.8 MB/s |
| Physics | 1102 frames/s | 2510 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 139 M matrices/s | 252 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 825.6 MB/s | 1470 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 63.4 KLines/s | 136.6 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 238.5 pages/s | 434.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 252.2 MP/sec | 529.3 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 223.8 pages/s | 353 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 46.2 frames/s | 79.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 91.6 frames/s | 172 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 15 MP/sec | 27.1 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 173.5 PPW | 391.7 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 333.1 PPW | 728 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 11.3 PPW | 25.7 PPW |
| Blender / W | 2.38 PPW | 4.56 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | May, 10, 2022 | January, 6, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Alder Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | i5-12450HX | 285H |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics (16EU) | Arc Graphics 140T |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Cores count | 8 | 16 |
| Threads count | 12 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 24x | 29x |
| L1 cache | 80 KB/core | 112 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 1280 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB total | 24 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 45-55 W | 35-45 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 157 W | 115 W |
| Socket | BGA-1964 | FCBGA-2049 |
| Critical temp. | 100 °C | 110 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR5-4800 - DDR4-3200 |
- LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
| Max Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB | n/a |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
