Intel Core i5 12600H vs Intel Core i5 10400F
54
out 100
VS
35
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core i5 12600H, vs Intel Core i5 10400F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 72.4 GOps/s | 41.5 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 52.2 GOps/s | 26 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 72 M primes/s | 35 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 28.1 M strings/s | 23.2 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 15 GB/s | 4.1 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 252.2 MB/s | 186.1 MB/s |
| Physics | 1264 frames/s | 698 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 148 M matrices/s | 125 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 895.9 MB/s | 452.1 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 75.3 KLines/s | 50.3 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 259.2 pages/s | 139.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 309.9 MP/sec | 190.7 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 229.9 pages/s | 151 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 46.9 frames/s | 33.8 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 93.5 frames/s | 51.9 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 16.6 MP/sec | 10.3 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 233.1 PPW | 96.4 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 477.2 PPW | 186.8 PPW |
| Blender / W | 4.09 PPW | 1.72 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | January, 4, 2022 | May, 1, 2020 |
| Type | Laptop use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Alder Lake | Comet Lake |
| Model number | i5-12600H | i5-10400F |
| Integrated GPU | Iris Xe Graphics (80EU) | No |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Cores | 8 | n/a |
| Threads | 8 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 3.3 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 12 | 6 |
| Threads count | 16 | 12 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 27x | 29x |
| L1 cache | 80 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 1280 KB/core | 256 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB total | 12 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 35-45 W | 65 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 95 W | n/a |
| Socket | BGA-1744 | LGA-1200 |
| Critical temp. | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR5-4800 - DDR4-3200 - LPDDR5-5200 - LPDDR4x-4267 |
DDR4-2666 |
| Max Size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 41.6 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 16 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core i5 12600H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
