Intel Core i9 13900K vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
86
out 100
VS
98
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core i9 13900K, vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 208.3 GOps/s | 174.7 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 151.9 GOps/s | 226.9 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 237 M primes/s | 612 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 88 M strings/s | 95.7 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 46.8 GB/s | 58.4 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 796.1 MB/s | 790.6 MB/s |
| Physics | 3140 frames/s | 4259 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 466 M matrices/s | 63 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1570 MB/s | 2000 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 193.2 KLines/s | 297.3 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 477 pages/s | 635.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 560.7 MP/sec | 716 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 301.8 pages/s | 447.5 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 75.8 frames/s | 116 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 162.5 frames/s | 210.5 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 43.5 MP/sec | 59 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 164 PPW | 219.2 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 469.8 PPW | 545.7 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 17.1 PPW | 19.9 PPW |
| Blender / W | 4.24 PPW | 4.92 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | September, 27, 2022 | March, 12, 2026 |
| Type | PC use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | i9-13900K | 270K+ |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc iGPU (4-Cores) |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3.0 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Cores count | 24 | 24 |
| Threads count | 32 | 24 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 30x | 37x |
| L1 cache | 80 KB/core | 192 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 3000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB total | 36 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 17.8 billion |
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 125 W | 125 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 253 W | 250 W |
| Socket | LGA-1700 | FCLGA-1851 |
| Critical temp. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR5-5600 - DDR4-3200 |
DDR5-7200 |
| Max Size | 192 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB | 115.2 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
