Intel Core Ultra 5 225 vs Intel Core i5 11400F
68
out 100
VS
44
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 5 225, vs Intel Core i5 11400F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 66.3 GOps/s | 57.7 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 93.5 GOps/s | 34.2 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 367 M primes/s | 51 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 36.4 M strings/s | 24.2 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 22.5 GB/s | 10.3 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 303.4 MB/s | 209.4 MB/s |
| Physics | 2547 frames/s | 842 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 268 M matrices/s | 15 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1210 MB/s | 681.4 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 108.2 KLines/s | 59.6 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 327.3 pages/s | 169.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 351.5 MP/sec | 242 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 320.3 pages/s | 201.4 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 69.3 frames/s | 42.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 113.1 frames/s | 68.9 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 21.2 MP/sec | 13.6 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 215.7 PPW | 126.1 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 472.5 PPW | 260.8 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 14.5 PPW | 8 PPW |
| Blender / W | n/a | 2.05 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | March, 16, 2021 |
| Type | PC use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Rocket Lake |
| Model number | 225 | i5-11400F |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics | No |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 6 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | n/a |
| Threads | 4 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.4 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 10 | 6 |
| Threads count | 10 | 12 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 33x | 26x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 512 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB total | 12 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 121 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | LGA-1200 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max Size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 50 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 20 |
| Tech | - Compute: ABM, ADX, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA - Performance: EIST, TBT 2.0, Thread Director - Virtualization: VMD, VT-d, VT-x - Security: RDRAND, TXT, XD bit |
n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 5 225 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
