Intel Core Ultra 5 225 vs Intel Core i5 12400F
68
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 5 225, vs Intel Core i5 12400F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 66.3 GOps/s | 60 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 93.5 GOps/s | 46.8 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 367 M primes/s | 72 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 36.4 M strings/s | 22.9 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 22.5 GB/s | 11.7 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 303.4 MB/s | 233.9 MB/s |
| Physics | 2547 frames/s | 1207 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 268 M matrices/s | 158 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1210 MB/s | 789 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 108.2 KLines/s | 69.9 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 327.3 pages/s | 221 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 351.5 MP/sec | 263.7 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 320.3 pages/s | 230 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 69.3 frames/s | 49.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 113.1 frames/s | 77.9 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 21.2 MP/sec | 16.2 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 215.7 PPW | 145.8 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 472.5 PPW | 299.5 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 14.5 PPW | 9.5 PPW |
| Blender / W | n/a | 2.48 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | January, 4, 2022 |
| Type | PC use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Alder Lake |
| Model number | 225 | i5-12400F |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics | No |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 6 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | n/a |
| Threads | 4 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.4 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 10 | 6 |
| Threads count | 10 | 12 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 33x | 25x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | 80 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 1280 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB total | 18 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 121 W | 117 W |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | LGA-1700 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | - DDR5-4800 - DDR4-3200 |
| Max Size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 76.8 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 20 |
| Tech | - Compute: ABM, ADX, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA - Performance: EIST, TBT 2.0, Thread Director - Virtualization: VMD, VT-d, VT-x - Security: RDRAND, TXT, XD bit |
n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 5 225 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
