Intel Core Ultra 5 225H vs AMD Ryzen 7 170
67
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, vs AMD Ryzen 7 170. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | n/a | 83 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | n/a | 46.7 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | n/a | 54 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | n/a | 28.9 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | n/a | 17.2 GB/s |
| Data Compression | n/a | 279.2 MB/s |
| Physics | n/a | 952 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | n/a | 188 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1170 MB/s | 955 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 95.1 KLines/s | 73.5 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 335.7 pages/s | 216.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 352.6 MP/sec | 302.6 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 296.4 pages/s | 202.8 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 59.8 frames/s | 48.6 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 125 frames/s | 84.5 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 20.9 MP/sec | 18.4 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 478.4 PPW | 187.5 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | n/a | 404.6 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 29.3 PPW | 13.3 PPW |
| Blender / W | n/a | 3.16 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | October, 1, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) |
| Model number | 225H | n/a |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon 680M |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Frequency | 1.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.9 GHz | 4.75 GHz |
| Cores | 8 | n/a |
| Threads | 8 | n/a |
| Frequency | 1.3 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.3 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 14 | 8 |
| Threads count | 14 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 17x | 32x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 512 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB total | 16 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 20-28 W | 35-54 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FP7 |
| Critical temp. | 110 °C | 95 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- DDR5-4800 - LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max Size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 76.8 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 20 |
| Tech | n/a | - Compute: BMI1, BMI2, F16C, SHA - Performance: Precision Boost 2, SMT - Virtualization: AMD-V - Security: EVP, NX-Bit, SMAP, SMEP |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 5 225H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
