Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
80
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 7 265, vs AMD Ryzen AI 5 430. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 139.9 GOps/s | n/a |
| Floating-Point Math | 174.3 GOps/s | n/a |
| Prime Number Search | 412 M primes/s | n/a |
| Random String Sort | 61.5 M strings/s | n/a |
| Data Encryption | 39.2 GB/s | n/a |
| Data Compression | 500.2 MB/s | n/a |
| Physics | 3128 frames/s | n/a |
| Extended Instructions | 384 M matrices/s | n/a |
| File Compression | 1350 MB/s | 729.9 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 172.4 KLines/s | 43.9 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 416.8 pages/s | 161.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 560.4 MP/sec | 205.7 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 337.1 pages/s | 274.6 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 88.5 frames/s | 39.1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 158.7 frames/s | 80.2 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 41.1 MP/sec | 9.85 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 304.8 PPW | 274.6 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 753.9 PPW | n/a |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 23.4 PPW | 19.9 PPW |
| Blender / W | 5.22 PPW | n/a |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | January, 5, 2026 |
| Type | PC use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 (Gorgon Point) |
| Model number | 265 | 430 |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics | Radeon 840M |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Cores | 12 | 3 |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Cores count | 20 | 4 |
| Threads count | 20 | 8 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 24x | 20x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | 80 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 1000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB total | 8 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 15-28 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 182 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | FP8 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | - DDR5-5600 - LPDDR5X-8000 |
| Max Size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | Yes | No |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 14 |
| Tech | - Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA - Performance: CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, Thread Director - Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x - Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro |
n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 7 265 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
