Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 7 265, vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2156
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1795
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
28684
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15043
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
131
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
100
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
1519
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
885
PassMark
PassMark CPU (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
4714
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3483
PassMark CPU (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
49003
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
24974
Integer Math139.9 GOps/s87.1 GOps/s
Floating-Point Math174.3 GOps/s64.1 GOps/s
Prime Number Search412 M primes/s113 M primes/s
Random String Sort61.5 M strings/s32.1 M strings/s
Data Encryption39.2 GB/s16.4 GB/s
Data Compression500.2 MB/s278.4 MB/s
Physics3128 frames/s1732 frames/s
Extended Instructions384 M matrices/s165 M matrices/s
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2992
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2421
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
19813
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12515
File Compression1350 MB/s1220 MB/s
Clang Compilation172.4 KLines/s100.8 KLines/s
HTML5 Browser416.8 pages/s270.5 pages/s
PDF Rendering560.4 MP/sec356.1 MP/sec
Text Processing337.1 pages/s243.4 pages/s
Background Blur88.5 frames/s49.2 frames/s
Photo Processing158.7 frames/s117.2 frames/s
Ray Tracing41.1 MP/sec19.4 MP/sec

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
338.98
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
172.02

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 304.8 PPW 192.5 PPW
PassMark CPU / W 753.9 PPW 384.2 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 23.4 PPW 13.6 PPW
Blender / W 5.22 PPW 2.65 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Announced December, 18, 2024 December, 14, 2023
Type PC use Laptop use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Meteor Lake
Model number 265 155H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics Arc Graphics (8-Cores)

Processor

Performance cores
Cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Frequency 2.4 GHz 1.4 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) 5.3 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficiency cores
Cores1210
Threads1210
Frequency1.8 GHz0.9 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo)4.6 GHz3.8 GHz
General
Cores count2016
Threads count2022
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier24x14x
L1 cache192 KB/core112 KB/core
L2 cache3000 KB/core2000 KB/core
L3 Cache30 MB total24 MB total
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Package

Process tech. 3 nm 7 nm
Power (TDP) 65 W 20-65 W
Max TDP (Boost) 182 W 115 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 FCBGA-2049
Critical temp. 105 °C 110 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type DDR5-6400 - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
Max Size 256 GB 96 GB
Channels 2 2
ECC support Yes No

Other

PCIe Version 5.0 5.0
Max PCIe Lanes 24 28
Tech - Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA
- Performance: CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, Thread Director
- Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x
- Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro
- Compute: ABM, ADX, AI Boost NPU 3, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA, VNNI
- Performance: EIST, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0, TSX
- Virtualization: VT-d, VT-x
- Security: RDRAND, TXT, XD bit, vPro

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 7 265 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below