Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 7 265, vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2156
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
2152
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
28684
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
28914
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
131
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
130
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
1519
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
1502
PassMark
PassMark CPU (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
4714
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
n/a
PassMark CPU (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
49003
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
n/a
Integer Math139.9 GOps/s137.6 GOps/s
Floating-Point Math174.3 GOps/s171.8 GOps/s
Prime Number Search412 M primes/s416 M primes/s
Random String Sort61.5 M strings/s60.4 M strings/s
Data Encryption39.2 GB/s38.3 GB/s
Data Compression500.2 MB/s488.8 MB/s
Physics3128 frames/s3063 frames/s
Extended Instructions384 M matrices/s376 M matrices/s
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2992
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
19813
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
n/a
File Compression1350 MB/s1350 MB/s
Clang Compilation172.4 KLines/s189.3 KLines/s
HTML5 Browser416.8 pages/s439.7 pages/s
PDF Rendering560.4 MP/sec561.5 MP/sec
Text Processing337.1 pages/s334.5 pages/s
Background Blur88.5 frames/s84.8 frames/s
Photo Processing158.7 frames/s153.2 frames/s
Ray Tracing41.1 MP/sec41.4 MP/sec

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
338.98
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
327.89

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 304.8 PPW 306.5 PPW
PassMark CPU / W 753.9 PPW 742.4 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 23.4 PPW 23.1 PPW
Blender / W 5.22 PPW 5.04 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Announced December, 18, 2024 December, 18, 2024
Type PC use PC use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Arrow Lake
Model number 265 265F
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics No

Processor

Performance cores
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Frequency 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) 5.3 GHz 5.3 GHz
Efficiency cores
Cores1212
Threads1212
Frequency1.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo)4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
General
Cores count2020
Threads count2020
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier24x24x
L1 cache192 KB/core192 KB/core
L2 cache3000 KB/core3000 KB/core
L3 Cache30 MB total30 MB total
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Package

Process tech. 3 nm 3 nm
Power (TDP) 65 W 65 W
Max TDP (Boost) 182 W 182 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 FCLGA-1851
Critical temp. 105 °C 105 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type DDR5-6400 DDR5-6400
Max Size 256 GB 256 GB
Channels 2 2
ECC support Yes Yes

Other

PCIe Version 5.0 5.0
Max PCIe Lanes 24 24
Tech - Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA
- Performance: CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, Thread Director
- Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x
- Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro
- Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA
- Performance: CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, Thread Director
- Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x
- Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below