Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100)
80
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 7 265, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 139.9 GOps/s | n/a |
| Floating-Point Math | 174.3 GOps/s | n/a |
| Prime Number Search | 412 M primes/s | n/a |
| Random String Sort | 61.5 M strings/s | n/a |
| Data Encryption | 39.2 GB/s | n/a |
| Data Compression | 500.2 MB/s | n/a |
| Physics | 3128 frames/s | n/a |
| Extended Instructions | 384 M matrices/s | n/a |
| File Compression | 1350 MB/s | n/a |
| Clang Compilation | 172.4 KLines/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 416.8 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 560.4 MP/sec | n/a |
| Text Processing | 337.1 pages/s | n/a |
| Background Blur | 88.5 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 158.7 frames/s | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 41.1 MP/sec | n/a |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 304.8 PPW | 350.7 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 753.9 PPW | n/a |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 23.4 PPW | 21.5 PPW |
| Blender / W | 5.22 PPW | n/a |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Qualcomm |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | January, 7, 2025 |
| Type | PC use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | ARMv9 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Snapdragon X |
| Model number | 265 | X1-26-100 |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.98 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.3 GHz | n/a |
| Cores | 12 | n/a |
| Threads | 12 | n/a |
| Frequency | 1.8 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 20 | 8 |
| Threads count | 20 | 8 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | n/a |
| Multiplier | 24x | 29x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 1536 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB total | 6 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 15-30 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 182 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | Custom |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | n/a |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X-8448 |
| Max Size | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC support | Yes | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 135 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | n/a |
| Tech | - Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA - Performance: CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, Thread Director - Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x - Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro |
n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 7 265 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 5
