Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
87
out 100
VS
98
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | n/a | 174.7 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | n/a | 226.9 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | n/a | 612 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | n/a | 95.7 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | n/a | 58.4 GB/s |
| Data Compression | n/a | 790.6 MB/s |
| Physics | n/a | 4259 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | n/a | 63 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1580 MB/s | 2000 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 201.1 KLines/s | 297.3 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 475.1 pages/s | 635.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 615.6 MP/sec | 716 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 350.8 pages/s | 447.5 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 76.9 frames/s | 116 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 167.2 frames/s | 210.5 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 42.2 MP/sec | 59 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 171 PPW | 219.2 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | n/a | 545.7 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 16.2 PPW | 19.9 PPW |
| Blender / W | 3.7 PPW | 4.92 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | October, 11, 2024 | March, 12, 2026 |
| Type | PC use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | 265K | 270K+ |
| Integrated GPU | Arc iGPU (4-Cores) | Arc iGPU (4-Cores) |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Cores | 12 | 16 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Cores count | 20 | 24 |
| Threads count | 20 | 24 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 39x | 37x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 192 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 3000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB total | 36 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 17.8 billion |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 125 W | 125 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 250 W | 250 W |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | FCLGA-1851 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-7200 |
| Max Size | 192 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 115.2 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
