Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
79
out 100
VS
55
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 157.3 GOps/s | 89.7 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 196.3 GOps/s | 50.1 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 449 M primes/s | 63 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 77 M strings/s | 32.1 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 48.7 GB/s | 19.2 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 624.8 MB/s | 307.1 MB/s |
| Physics | 3093 frames/s | 1159 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 485 M matrices/s | 209 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1480 MB/s | 984.2 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 216.2 KLines/s | 80.9 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 435.5 pages/s | 221.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 545.5 MP/sec | 331.2 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 344.8 pages/s | 209.8 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 78.6 frames/s | 34.6 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 156.4 frames/s | 82.9 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 46.2 MP/sec | 20 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 371.8 PPW | 228.2 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 1027.3 PPW | 542.9 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 40.4 PPW | n/a |
| Blender / W | 6.54 PPW | 4.16 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | January, 4, 2022 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) |
| Model number | 275HX | n/a |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 680M |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Cores | 16 | n/a |
| Threads | 16 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2.1 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 24 | 8 |
| Threads count | 24 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 27x | 33x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 512 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB total | 16 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 45-55 W | 45 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 160 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCBGA-2114 | FP7 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 95 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | - DDR5-4800 - LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max Size | 192 GB | 64 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | Yes | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 76.8 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 20 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
