Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 13650HX
86
out 100
VS
60
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 285, vs Intel Core i7 13650HX. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | n/a | 103.3 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | n/a | 76 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | n/a | 102 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | n/a | 41.3 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | n/a | 21.8 GB/s |
| Data Compression | n/a | 386.7 MB/s |
| Physics | n/a | 1748 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | n/a | 233 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1500 MB/s | 1110 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 234.5 KLines/s | 108.1 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 453.4 pages/s | 302.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 585.9 MP/sec | 382.7 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 358.6 pages/s | 248.2 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 87 frames/s | 56.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 147.8 frames/s | 112.5 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 47.9 MP/sec | 24.4 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 332.9 PPW | 242.3 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | n/a | 560.8 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 30.4 PPW | 18.3 PPW |
| Blender / W | n/a | 4.44 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | January, 3, 2023 |
| Type | PC use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake |
| Model number | 285 | i7-13650HX |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics | UHD Graphics (16EU) |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Cores count | 24 | 14 |
| Threads count | 24 | 20 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 25x | 26x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | 80 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB total | 24 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 45-55 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 182 W | 157 W |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | BGA-1964 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | - DDR5-4800 - DDR4-3200 |
| Max Size | 256 GB | 192 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 76.8 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 20 |
| Tech | - Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA - Performance: CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, TVB, Thread Director - Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x - Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro |
n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
