Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
73
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 83.4 GOps/s | 101.6 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 106.9 GOps/s | 62.1 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 340 M primes/s | 93 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 38.3 M strings/s | 43.2 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 24.7 GB/s | 21.4 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 311.8 MB/s | 358.4 MB/s |
| Physics | 2510 frames/s | 1439 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 252 M matrices/s | 271 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1470 MB/s | 494.2 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 136.6 KLines/s | 92.7 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 434.7 pages/s | 287.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 529.3 MP/sec | 280.8 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 353 pages/s | 251.5 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 79.5 frames/s | 65.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 172 frames/s | 104.2 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 27.1 MP/sec | 27.1 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 391.7 PPW | 219.9 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 728 PPW | 553.5 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 25.7 PPW | 17.9 PPW |
| Blender / W | 4.56 PPW | 4.05 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | December, 6, 2023 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 4 (Hawk Point) |
| Model number | 285H | n/a |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon 780M |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2.9 GHz | 4.0 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Cores | 10 | n/a |
| Threads | 10 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.5 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 16 | 8 |
| Threads count | 16 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 40x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 1000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB total | 16 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 25 billion |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 35-45 W | 35-54 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FP8 |
| Critical temp. | 110 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- DDR5-5600 - LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max Size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 20 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
