Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5 14450HX
73
out 100
VS
58
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, vs Intel Core i5 14450HX. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 83.4 GOps/s | 79.1 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 106.9 GOps/s | 58.9 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 340 M primes/s | 109 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 38.3 M strings/s | 29.8 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 24.7 GB/s | 16.2 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 311.8 MB/s | 289.4 MB/s |
| Physics | 2510 frames/s | 1769 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 252 M matrices/s | 179 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1470 MB/s | 913.4 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 136.6 KLines/s | 99.7 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 434.7 pages/s | 246.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 529.3 MP/sec | 337.1 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 353 pages/s | 254.1 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 79.5 frames/s | 55.2 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 172 frames/s | 85.7 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 27.1 MP/sec | 22.2 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 391.7 PPW | 215.4 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 728 PPW | 453 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 25.7 PPW | n/a |
| Blender / W | 4.56 PPW | n/a |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | January, 9, 2024 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake Refresh |
| Model number | 285H | i5-14450HX |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140T | UHD Graphics (16EU) |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 6 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 10 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Cores count | 16 | 10 |
| Threads count | 16 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 24x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 80 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB total | 20 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 35-45 W | 45-55 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | 157 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | BGA-1964 |
| Critical temp. | 110 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- DDR5-5600 - DDR4-3200 |
| Max Size | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 89.6 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 20 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
