Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
82
out 100
VS
64
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, vs AMD Ryzen 7 8700G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | n/a | 102.8 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | n/a | 63.5 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | n/a | 104 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | n/a | 45.7 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | n/a | 22.8 GB/s |
| Data Compression | n/a | 386.1 MB/s |
| Physics | n/a | 1661 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | n/a | 29 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | n/a | 1440 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | n/a | 108.2 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 303.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 402.6 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | n/a | 272 pages/s |
| Background Blur | n/a | 65.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 108 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 23.6 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 397.1 PPW | 218.8 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | n/a | 486.4 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 36.8 PPW | 15.3 PPW |
| Blender / W | n/a | 3.77 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | January, 8, 2024 |
| Type | Laptop use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 4 (Phoenix) |
| Model number | 285HX | n/a |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 780M |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Cores | 16 | n/a |
| Threads | 16 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2.1 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 24 | 8 |
| Threads count | 24 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 28x | 42x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 1000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB total | 16 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 25 billion |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 45-55 W | 45-65 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 160 W | 88 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2114 | AM5 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 95 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max Size | 192 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | Yes | No |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 20 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
