Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core), vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
0
0
0
0
88
53
43
26
The Witcher 3
157
107
78
61
80
63
43
22
Counter-Strike 2
0
0
0
0
131
93
68
28
Far Cry 6
0
0
0
0
71
62
46
23
Hogwarts Legacy
0
0
0
0
44
36
28
13
COD Modern Warfare 3
0
0
0
0
56
44
32
20
Ghost of Tsushima
0
0
0
0
43
34
22
13
Cyberpunk 2077
0
0
0
0
44
39
22
10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
0
0
0
0
77
71
47
23
Avg FPS
1080p High-70
1080p Ultra-55
1440p Ultra-39
4K Ultra-20
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
13577
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5672
Time Spyn/a6047
Solar Bay3156119265
Port Royaln/a1549
Fire Striken/a16183
Night Raidn/a74430
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
116754
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
67074
Background Blur195 frames/s122.5 frames/s
Face Detection125.9 frames/s68.6 frames/s
Horizon Detection4.82 Gpix/sec2.56 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection7.47 Gpix/sec3.33 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur5.8 Gpix/sec3.21 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching1.06 Gpix/sec0.86 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching417.4 Gpix/sec273.3 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics17079.9 fps8476.3 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
12712
G2D Markn/a804
DirectX 11n/a103 fps
DirectX 12n/a49 fps
GPU Computen/a5099 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
247.3 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
70.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)1316.3 fps396.1 fps
Car Chase950.9 fps339.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)911 fps304.7 fps
T-Rex3917.4 fps1502.8 fps
ALU 21756 fps1607.1 fps
Driver Overhead 2654.4 fps272.1 fps
APIMetalOpenGL
OSOS XWindows
Tessellationn/a1760.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Apple Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced October, 30, 2024 October, 29, 2019
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Professional Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Apple M GPU Turing
Codename Custom TU116
Price n/a 229

GPU

GPU Frequency 500 MHz 1530 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800 MHz 1785 MHz
Shader Units 5120 1408
TMUs 320 88
ROPs 160 48
Execution Units 640 22
Ray Tracing Cores n/a No
Tensor Cores n/a No
L1 cache n/a 64 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 1536 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 288 Gpix/sec 86 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 576 GTex/s 157 GTex/s
FLOPS 18.4 TFLOPS 5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Custom PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 62 W 125 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 3 nm 12 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 284 mm²
Transistor count n/a 6 billion
Transistor density n/a 21.13 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency 8533 MHz 1750 MHz
Bus 512 bit 192 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 14000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 6 GB
Max Throughput
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
546 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
336 GB/s

API

DirectX n/a 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL n/a 4.6
CUDA n/a 7.5
DisplayPort n/a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below