Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core) vs AMD Radeon 880M

Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core), vs AMD Radeon 880M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core) and AMD Radeon 880M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
58
31
23
13
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
34
26
16
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
52
34
25
11
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
42
37
25
12
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
21
17
12
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
39
30
25
13
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
23
18
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
23
20
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
39
35
21
10
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a37
1080p Ultran/a28
1440p Ultran/a19
4K Ultran/a9
Deviationn/aHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
6712
AMD Radeon 880M
2998
Time Spyn/a3204
Solar Bayn/a14302
Port Royaln/a1602
Fire Striken/a8146
Night Raidn/a37492
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
61008
AMD Radeon 880M
31270
Background Blur106 frames/s72 frames/s
Face Detection73.1 frames/s35.7 frames/s
Horizon Detection2.59 Gpix/sec1.04 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection3.8 Gpix/sec1.33 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.4 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.73 Gpix/sec0.44 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching198.6 Gpix/sec115.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics8166.3 fps4880.8 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
n/a
AMD Radeon 880M
7720
G2D Markn/a984
DirectX 11n/a74 fps
DirectX 12n/a32 fps
GPU Computen/a3592 Ops/s

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Apple AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced October, 29, 2024 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Professional Universal
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Apple M GPU RDNA 3+
Codename Custom Strix Point

GPU

GPU Frequency 500 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 2048 768
TMUs 128 48
ROPs 64 32
Execution Units 256 12
Ray Tracing Cores n/a 12
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 115 Gpix/sec 93 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 230 GTex/s 139 GTex/s
FLOPS 7.4 TFLOPS 4.5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Custom PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 26 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 3 nm 4 nm
Max temperature 100 °C 100 °C
Transistor Size n/a 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
Memory Frequency 7500 MHz n/a
Bus 192 bit n/a
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 15000 MB/s n/a
Max Throughput
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
273 GB/s
AMD Radeon 880M
n/a

API

DirectX n/a 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL n/a 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below