Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
13
out 100
VS
80
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 33 15 15 n/a | 228 165 158 124 |
 The Witcher 3 | 22 20 14 n/a | 241 218 152 83 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 46 29 23 n/a | 310 225 168 86 |
 Far Cry 6 | 30 28 20 9 | 181 161 148 92 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 18 13 11 n/a | 161 133 109 62 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 30 26 16 11 | 219 215 169 114 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 13 9 9 n/a | 152 122 110 71 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 13 12 n/a n/a | 201 178 120 56 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30 27 15 n/a | 279 265 205 107 |
| 1080p High | 26 | 219 |
| 1080p Ultra | 20 | 187 |
| 1440p Ultra | 14 | 149 |
| 4K Ultra | - | 88 |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 2352 | 28302 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 138446 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 18312 |
| Fire Strike | 7703 | 63725 |
| Night Raid | 33459 | 179276 |
| Background Blur | 56.6 frames/s | 279.5 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 27.4 frames/s | 220.1 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 0.82 Gpix/sec | 11 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.2 Gpix/sec | 15.2 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.27 Gpix/sec | 16.2 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.18 Gpix/sec | 2.08 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 66.3 Gpix/sec | 1370 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 1916.5 fps | 37199.7 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 649 | 1267 |
| DirectX 11 | 45 fps | 303 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 25 fps | 133 fps |
| GPU Compute | 2657 Ops/s | 19970 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 196 fps | 1384.7 fps |
| Car Chase | 195.2 fps | 1210.8 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 166.6 fps | 998.7 fps |
| T-Rex | 839.6 fps | 5172 fps |
| ALU 2 | 744.9 fps | 9885.2 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 270.3 fps | 282.1 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 848.1 | 9573.9 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | October, 25, 2016 | January, 31, 2024 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Entry-level | High-end |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | GP107 | AD103 |
| Price | 139 | 999 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1291 MHz | 2295 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 2550 MHz |
| Shader Units | 768 | 10240 |
| TMUs | 48 | 320 |
| ROPs | 32 | 112 |
| Execution Units | 6 | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 320 |
| L1 cache | 48 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 45 Gpix/sec | 286 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 67 GTex/s | 816 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 2.1 TFLOPS | 52.2 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 75 W | 320 W |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Max temperature | 97 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 132 mm² | 379 mm² |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | 45 billion |
| Transistor density | 22.73 MTr/mm² | 118.73 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 1752 MHz | 1438 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 7000 MB/s | 23000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
