Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon 880M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, vs AMD Radeon 880M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and AMD Radeon 880M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
56
31
27
14
58
31
23
13
The Witcher 3
43
37
24
11
34
26
16
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
77
53
37
14
52
34
25
11
Far Cry 6
45
40
26
15
42
37
25
12
Hogwarts Legacy
24
18
16
9
21
17
12
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
38
28
21
13
39
30
25
13
Ghost of Tsushima
26
15
15
n/a
23
18
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
25
24
14
n/a
23
20
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
50
46
26
14
39
35
21
10
Avg FPS
1080p High4337
1080p Ultra3228
1440p Ultra2319
4K Ultra119
DeviationLowHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3491
AMD Radeon 880M
2998
Time Spy36753204
Solar Bayn/a14302
Port Royaln/a1602
Fire Strike100788146
Night Raid4227037492
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
47056
AMD Radeon 880M
31270
Background Blur83.5 frames/s72 frames/s
Face Detection45.7 frames/s35.7 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.77 Gpix/sec1.04 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection2.32 Gpix/sec1.33 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.28 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.62 Gpix/sec0.44 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching204.1 Gpix/sec115.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5954.3 fps4880.8 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
7537
AMD Radeon 880M
7720
G2D Mark381984
DirectX 1161 fps74 fps
DirectX 1233 fps32 fps
GPU Compute2733 Ops/s3592 Ops/s

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced April, 2, 2020 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Turing RDNA 3+
Codename TU117 (N18P-G62) Strix Point

GPU

GPU Frequency 1350 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1485 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 1024 768
TMUs 64 48
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 16 12
Ray Tracing Cores No 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 48 Gpix/sec 93 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 95 GTex/s 139 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 4.5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 50 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 4 nm
Max temperature n/a 100 °C
Transistor Size 200 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 4.7 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 23.5 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Frequency 1500 MHz n/a
Bus 128 bit n/a
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 12000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 4 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
192 GB/s
AMD Radeon 880M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below