Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
17
out 100
VS
46
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 970, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Background Blur | 77.1 frames/s | n/a |
| Face Detection | 38.1 frames/s | n/a |
| Horizon Detection | 1.28 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Edge Detection | 2.08 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.85 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Feature Matching | 0.17 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Stereo Matching | 92.9 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Particle Physics | 2443 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenCL | n/a |
| G2D Mark | 766 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 71 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 41 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 4083 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 275.6 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 273.9 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 237.9 fps | n/a |
| T-Rex | 1112.2 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 5981 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 250.7 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 1804.1 | n/a |
Blender
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | September, 19, 2014 | June, 24, 2025 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Codename | GM204 | GB207 |
| Price | 329 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1050 MHz | 2235-2520 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1178 MHz | 1500-2662 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1664 | 2560 |
| TMUs | 104 | 80 |
| ROPs | 56 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 13 | 20 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 80 |
| L1 cache | 48 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 32000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 66 Gpix/sec | 48-85 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 123 GTex/s | 120-213 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 3.9 TFLOPS | 7.7-13.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| TGP | 148 W | 35-100 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 398 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 5 billion | n/a |
| Transistor density | 12.56 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Frequency | 1753 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 7000 MB/s | 24000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 12.0 |
| DisplayPort | 1.2 | 2.1b |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 4 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
