Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) vs Adreno X2-90
46
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB), vs Adreno X2-90. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 161 104 94 72 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 177 152 109 59 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 266 199 143 82 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 137 127 108 67 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 109 91 69 39 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 139 130 96 63 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 96 82 63 37 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 121 106 68 30 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 186 176 130 70 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 155 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 130 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 98 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 58 | n/a |
| Deviation | High | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 15883 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 75679 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 10187 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 42670 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 147785 | n/a |
| G2D Mark | 1200 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 217 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 86 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 12135 Ops/s | n/a |
Blender
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Adreno |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | April, 15, 2025 | September, 25, 2025 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Adreno X1 |
| Codename | GB206-300 | Adreno X1 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2407 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2572 MHz | 1700-1850 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4608 | 1536 |
| TMUs | 144 | 96 |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| Execution Units | 36 | 6 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | n/a |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 32000 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 123 Gpix/sec | 82-89 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 370 GTex/s | 163-178 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 23.7 TFLOPS | 5.2-5.7 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | IGP |
| TGP | 180 W | n/a |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor Size | 263 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 31.1 billion | n/a |
| Transistor density | 118.25 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR7 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 128 bit | n/a |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 28000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| CUDA | 12.0 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 2.1b | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
