Intel Arc 130T vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 130T, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 130T and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
49
28
17
9
33
15
15
n/a
The Witcher 3
39
31
24
11
22
20
14
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
43
26
18
10
46
29
23
n/a
Far Cry 6
34
29
19
9
30
28
20
9
Hogwarts Legacy
17
13
10
n/a
18
13
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
26
28
20
12
30
26
16
11
Ghost of Tsushima
19
15
10
n/a
13
9
9
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
22
15
10
n/a
13
12
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
34
31
18
12
30
27
15
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High3126
1080p Ultra2420
1440p Ultra1614
4K Ultra9-
DeviationHighLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 130T
2419
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2312
Time Spy37422352
Solar Bay14696n/a
Port Royal1902n/a
Fire Strike91067703
Night Raid4101733459
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 130T
36282
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
21180
Background Blur70.9 frames/s56.6 frames/s
Face Detection34.9 frames/s27.4 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.13 Gpix/sec0.82 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.42 Gpix/sec1.2 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.96 Gpix/sec1.27 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.45 Gpix/sec0.18 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching131.5 Gpix/sec66.3 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics7360.9 fps1916.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 130T
6127
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
6329
G2D Mark881649
DirectX 1142 fps45 fps
DirectX 1223 fps25 fps
GPU Compute3275 Ops/s2657 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 130T
38.8 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
34.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a196 fps
Car Chasen/a195.2 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a166.6 fps
T-Rexn/a839.6 fps
ALU 2n/a744.9 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a270.3 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a848.1

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 October, 25, 2016
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Xe+ Pascal
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU GP107
Price n/a 139

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 1291 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2200 MHz 1392 MHz
Shader Units 896 768
TMUs 56 48
ROPs 28 32
Execution Units 7 6
Ray Tracing Cores 7 No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache n/a 48 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 62 Gpix/sec 45 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 123 GTex/s 67 GTex/s
FLOPS 3.9 TFLOPS 2.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP n/a 75 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 5 nm 14 nm
Max temperature 110 °C 97 °C
Transistor Size n/a 132 mm²
Transistor count n/a 3 billion
Transistor density n/a 22.73 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR5
Memory Frequency n/a 1752 MHz
Bus n/a 128 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 7000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 130T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
112.1 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 6.1
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc 130T the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below