Intel Arc 140T vs Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High37n/a
1080p Ultra29n/a
1440p Ultra19n/a
4K Ultra10n/a
DeviationMediumn/a

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
3903
Time Spy4003n/a
Solar Bay1403312166
Port Royal2111n/a
Fire Strike9166n/a
Night Raid39575n/a
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
42227
Background Blur90 frames/s74.5 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s47.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec1.73 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec3.32 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec1.75 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.47 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec131.2 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps5143 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
n/a
G2D Mark871n/a
DirectX 1150 fpsn/a
DirectX 1229 fpsn/a
GPU Compute3632 Ops/sn/a
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
881.8 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps1390.1 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps1102.6 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps1953.2 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps2704.8 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps598.5 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps485.7 fps
APIOpenGLMetal
OSWindowsOS X
Tessellation1452.9n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 6, 2025 October, 18, 2021
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe+ Apple M GPU
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 450 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1296 MHz
Shader Units 1024 2048
TMUs 64 128
ROPs 32 64
Execution Units 8 256
Ray Tracing Cores 8 No
Tensor Cores No n/a
L2 cache 8000 KB/core n/a
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 83 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 166 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 5.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus Custom
TGP n/a 30 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 5 nm
Max temperature 110 °C 94 °C
Transistor count n/a 23.2 billion

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
Memory Frequency n/a 6400 MHz
Bus n/a 256 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 12800 MB/s
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
204.8 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 n/a
OpenGL 4.6 n/a
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 n/a
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below