Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
88
53
43
26
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
80
63
43
22
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
131
93
68
28
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
71
62
46
23
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
44
36
28
13
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
56
44
32
20
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
43
34
22
13
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
44
39
22
10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
77
71
47
23
Avg FPS
1080p High3770
1080p Ultra2955
1440p Ultra1939
4K Ultra1020
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5672
Time Spy40036047
Solar Bay1403319265
Port Royal21111549
Fire Strike916616183
Night Raid3957574430
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
67074
Background Blur90 frames/s122.5 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s68.6 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec2.56 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec3.33 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec3.21 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.86 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec273.3 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps8476.3 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
12712
G2D Mark871804
DirectX 1150 fps103 fps
DirectX 1229 fps49 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s5099 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
70.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps396.1 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps339.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps304.7 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps1502.8 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps1607.1 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps272.1 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.91760.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 October, 29, 2019
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Xe+ Turing
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU TU116
Price n/a 229

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 1530 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1785 MHz
Shader Units 1024 1408
TMUs 64 88
ROPs 32 48
Execution Units 8 22
Ray Tracing Cores 8 No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache n/a 64 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 1536 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 86 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 157 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP n/a 125 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 12 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 284 mm²
Transistor count n/a 6 billion
Transistor density n/a 21.13 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1750 MHz
Bus n/a 192 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 14000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 6 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
336 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 7.5
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below