Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
29
out 100
VS
17
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 970. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 55 30 21 12 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 47 35 26 12 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 51 37 27 11 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 41 34 22 11 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 21 15 10 n/a | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 29 30 19 13 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 25 16 14 n/a | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 27 24 12 n/a | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 39 36 23 14 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 37 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 29 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 19 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 10 | n/a |
| Deviation | Medium | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 4003 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 14033 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 2111 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 9166 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 39575 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 90 frames/s | 77.1 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 39.5 frames/s | 38.1 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 1.21 Gpix/sec | 1.28 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.52 Gpix/sec | 2.08 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 2.41 Gpix/sec | 1.85 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.51 Gpix/sec | 0.17 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 161.8 Gpix/sec | 92.9 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 9155.9 fps | 2443 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 871 | 766 |
| DirectX 11 | 50 fps | 71 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 29 fps | 41 fps |
| GPU Compute | 3632 Ops/s | 4083 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 268.2 fps | 275.6 fps |
| Car Chase | 174.6 fps | 273.9 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 170.5 fps | 237.9 fps |
| T-Rex | 927.1 fps | 1112.2 fps |
| ALU 2 | 1123.4 fps | 5981 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 153.3 fps | 250.7 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 1452.9 | 1804.1 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Nvidia |
| Build | Integrated | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | September, 19, 2014 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Universal | Gaming |
| Segment | Entry-level | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake iGPU | GM204 |
| Price | n/a | 329 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2250-2350 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1024 | 1664 |
| TMUs | 64 | 104 |
| ROPs | 32 | 56 |
| Execution Units | 8 | 13 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | No |
| Tensor Cores | No | No |
| L1 cache | n/a | 48 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 8000 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 72-75 Gpix/sec | 66 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 144-150 GTex/s | 123 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS | 3.9 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TGP | n/a | 148 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Max temperature | 110 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 398 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 5 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 12.56 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1753 MHz |
| Bus | n/a | 256 bit |
| ECC support | n/a | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | n/a | 7000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | n/a | 4 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | No | 5.2 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | No |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc 140T the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
