Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
186
129
117
86
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
202
173
123
67
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
272
215
154
85
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
152
144
126
77
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
132
106
85
47
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
166
158
123
80
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
116
99
81
51
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
146
130
89
42
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
236
220
169
92
Avg FPS
1080p High37179
1080p Ultra29153
1440p Ultra19119
4K Ultra1070
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
21408
Time Spy400319630
Solar Bay1403396489
Port Royal211113261
Fire Strike916647892
Night Raid39575143788
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
196756
Background Blur90 frames/s239.8 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s156.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec10.8 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec14.8 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec11.9 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec1.53 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec889.6 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps26054.6 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
26944
G2D Mark8711088
DirectX 1150 fps223 fps
DirectX 1229 fps111 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s15428 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
227.3 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps1039 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps860.8 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps743.2 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps3834.2 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps6702 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps296.1 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.96622.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 January, 3, 2021
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level High-end
Architecture Xe+ Ampere
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU GA102
Price n/a 1199

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 1365 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1665 MHz
Shader Units 1024 10240
TMUs 64 320
ROPs 32 112
Execution Units 8 80
Ray Tracing Cores 8 80
Tensor Cores No 320
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 6000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 186 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 533 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 34.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP n/a 350 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 5 nm 8 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 628 mm²
Transistor count n/a 28 billion
Transistor density n/a 44.59 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6X
Memory Frequency n/a 1188 MHz
Bus n/a 384 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 19000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 12 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
912 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 8.6
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below