Intel Arc 140T vs AMD Radeon 860M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs AMD Radeon 860M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and AMD Radeon 860M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High37n/a
1080p Ultra29n/a
1440p Ultra19n/a
4K Ultra10n/a
DeviationMediumn/a

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
AMD Radeon 860M
2572
Time Spy4003n/a
Solar Bay14033n/a
Port Royal2111n/a
Fire Strike9166n/a
Night Raid39575n/a
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
AMD Radeon 860M
25630
Background Blur90 frames/s57.2 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s30.5 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec0.83 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec1.16 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec0.93 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.35 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec97.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps3933.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
AMD Radeon 860M
n/a
G2D Mark871n/a
DirectX 1150 fpsn/a
DirectX 1229 fpsn/a
GPU Compute3632 Ops/sn/a
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
AMD Radeon 860M
n/a
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fpsn/a
Car Chase174.6 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fpsn/a
T-Rex927.1 fpsn/a
ALU 21123.4 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLn/a
OSWindowsn/a
Tessellation1452.9n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 6, 2025 January, 7, 2025
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe+ RDNA 3.5
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU Krackan Point

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz n/a
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 3000 MHz
Shader Units 1024 512
TMUs 64 32
ROPs 32 16
Execution Units 8 8
Ray Tracing Cores 8 8
Tensor Cores No n/a
L2 cache 8000 KB/core n/a
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 4 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 48 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 96 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 6.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP n/a 15-54 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 4 nm
Max temperature 110 °C 100 °C

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below