Intel Arc 140V vs Intel UHD Graphics G1
31
out 100
VS
18
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140V, vs Intel UHD Graphics G1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Time Spy | 3715 | 385 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 1175 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 5443 |
| Background Blur | 73.6 frames/s | 9.94 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 39 frames/s | 5.9 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 0.79 Gpix/sec | 0.18 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.11 Gpix/sec | 0.24 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.6 Gpix/sec | 0.19 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.38 Gpix/sec | 0.05 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 107.1 Gpix/sec | 14 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 4521.5 fps | 852 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 656 | 324 |
| DirectX 11 | 39 fps | 11 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 25 fps | 6 fps |
| GPU Compute | 3440 Ops/s | 813 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 161.8 fps | 37.2 fps |
| Car Chase | 132.1 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 27.3 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 156.2 fps |
| ALU 2 | 764.1 fps | 107.7 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 122.5 fps | 185.4 fps |
| API | OpenGL | Metal |
| OS | Windows | OS X |
| Tessellation | 998.2 | n/a |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Announced | September, 4, 2024 | May, 28, 2019 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Universal | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Generation 11 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1950-2050 MHz | 900-1050 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1024 | 256 |
| TMUs | n/a | 16 |
| ROPs | n/a | 8 |
| Execution Units | n/a | 32 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | No | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | n/a | 7-8 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | n/a | 14-17 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 4-4.2 TFLOPS | 0.5 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| TGP | 30 W | 15 W |
| Process | Intel | Intel |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Max temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| ECC support | No | n/a |
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| CUDA | No | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | n/a |
| DLSS | No | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc 140V the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
