Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc A380

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc A750, vs Intel Arc A380. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc A750 and Intel Arc A380
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
116
67
60
43
60
34
24
13
The Witcher 3
128
110
78
42
49
40
27
14
Counter-Strike 2
155
109
81
41
52
37
28
12
Far Cry 6
99
88
67
37
40
36
25
12
Hogwarts Legacy
63
52
37
21
19
16
12
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
69
70
48
30
31
31
19
13
Ghost of Tsushima
64
51
38
19
25
20
17
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
80
68
46
18
26
24
12
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
112
98
70
39
42
37
26
14
Avg FPS
1080p High9838
1080p Ultra7931
1440p Ultra5821
4K Ultra3211
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc A750
10871
Intel Arc A380
3508
Time Spy124484279
Solar Bay4530414871
Port Royal65781533
Fire Strike3092710421
Night Raid11095849357
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc A750
99280
Intel Arc A380
39896
Background Blur145.2 frames/s81.3 frames/s
Face Detection82 frames/s38.4 frames/s
Horizon Detection3.35 Gpix/sec1.18 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection5.01 Gpix/sec1.65 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur7.59 Gpix/sec2.45 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.81 Gpix/sec0.46 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching462.4 Gpix/sec146.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics18623.1 fps7107.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc A750
12348
Intel Arc A380
6225
G2D Mark719605
DirectX 1170 fps38 fps
DirectX 1270 fps34 fps
GPU Compute5393 Ops/s2764 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc A750
137.9 fps
Intel Arc A380
47.3 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)732.4 fps268.6 fps
Car Chase471.7 fps190.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)465.4 fps179 fps
T-Rex2668.4 fps1033.3 fps
ALU 23065.6 fps1103.3 fps
Driver Overhead 2170.6 fps169.3 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation3725.61466.6

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced October, 12, 2023 January, 14, 2022
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.7 Generation 12.7
Codename DG2-512 DG2-128
Price 289 139

GPU

GPU Frequency 2050 MHz 2000 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2400 MHz 2050 MHz
Shader Units 3584 1024
TMUs 224 64
ROPs 112 32
Ray Tracing Cores 28 8
Tensor Cores 448 128
L2 cache 16000 KB/core 4000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 269 Gpix/sec 66 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 538 GTex/s 131 GTex/s
FLOPS 17.2 TFLOPS 4.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 225 W 75 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 6 nm
Transistor Size 406 mm² 157 mm²
Transistor count 21 billion 7 billion
Transistor density 51.72 MTr/mm² 44.59 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 2000 MHz 1937 MHz
Bus 256 bit 96 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 16000 MB/s 15500 MB/s
Memory Size 8 GB 6 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc A750
512 GB/s
Intel Arc A380
186 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort 2.0 2.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc A750 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below