Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Compared 2 processors: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU), vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
22
9
n/a
n/a
24
12
9
n/a
The Witcher 3
12
11
n/a
n/a
9
11
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
18
12
10
n/a
27
17
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
14
11
n/a
n/a
19
17
10
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
13
11
10
n/a
20
15
13
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
13
13
9
n/a
15
15
10
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1316
1080p Ultra1012
1440p Ultra-9
4K Ultra--
DeviationHighLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
934
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
1248
Time Spy12301413
Fire Strike41964515
Night Raid1497717937
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
14240
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
10472
Background Blur31 frames/s21.2 frames/s
Face Detection23.3 frames/s10.9 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.61 Gpix/sec0.34 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.87 Gpix/sec0.65 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.36 Gpix/sec0.51 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.15 Gpix/sec0.13 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching36.1 Gpix/sec34.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2493.2 fps1322.9 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
2668
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
1580
G2D Mark382409
DirectX 1116 fps10 fps
DirectX 1213 fps8 fps
GPU Compute1285 Ops/s874 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
26.9 fps
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
12.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)174.8 fps77 fps
Car Chasen/a68.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a58.9 fps
T-Rexn/a293.7 fps
ALU 2n/a318 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a98.4 fps
APIVulkanOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a340.4

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced August, 15, 2020 February, 13, 2018
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.1 GCN 5.0
Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Raven

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 850-1500 MHz 1100-2100 MHz
Shader Units 640 512
TMUs 40 32
ROPs 20 8
Execution Units 80 8
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L2 cache 1024 KB/core n/a
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 17-30 Gpix/sec 9-17 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 34-60 GTex/s 35-67 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.1-1.9 TFLOPS 1.1-2.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus IGP
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 10 nm 7 nm
Transistor Size 146 mm² 210 mm²
Transistor count n/a 4.94 billion
Transistor density n/a 23.52 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below