Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: Intel UHD Graphics 620, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a33
1080p Ultran/a24
1440p Ultran/a16
4K Ultran/a-
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel UHD Graphics 620
327
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy3612781
Solar Bayn/a11162
Port Royaln/a1580
Fire Strike11557824
Night Raid510433611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel UHD Graphics 620
5288
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur10.4 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection6.19 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.19 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.27 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.18 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.07 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching20.8 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics769 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics 620
1042
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Mark241878
DirectX 118 fps67 fps
DirectX 125 fps31 fps
GPU Compute442 Ops/s3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel UHD Graphics 620
5.6 fps
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)35.2 fps183.4 fps
Car Chasen/a202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a161.6 fps
T-Rexn/a699.9 fps
ALU 2n/a849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a268.9 fps
APIVulkanOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a1373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced August, 28, 2018 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Generation 9.5 RDNA 3.0
Codename Whiskey Lake GT2 Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1000-1150 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 192 768
TMUs 24 48
ROPs 3 32
Execution Units 24 12
Ray Tracing Cores n/a 12
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 3 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 24-28 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.4 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 14 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 49 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 0.19 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 3.88 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.1.103 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort 1.2 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below