Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU) vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU), vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU) and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
20
9
n/a
n/a
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
11
9
n/a
n/a
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
15
10
9
n/a
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
12
9
n/a
n/a
39
31
19
10
COD Modern Warfare 3
11
9
9
n/a
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
9
n/a
n/a
35
31
18
9
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1133
1080p Ultra-24
1440p Ultra-16
4K Ultra--
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
792
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy10782781
Solar Bayn/a11162
Port Royaln/a1580
Fire Strike34977824
Night Raid1368133611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
12607
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur27.6 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection19.2 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.52 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.76 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.37 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.14 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching33 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2055.2 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Markn/a878
DirectX 11n/a67 fps
DirectX 12n/a31 fps
GPU Computen/a3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a183.4 fps
Car Chasen/a202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a161.6 fps
T-Rexn/a699.9 fps
ALU 2n/a849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a268.9 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 4, 2022 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe architecture (Gen12) RDNA 3.0
Codename Alder Lake GT1 Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 850-1500 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 512 768
TMUs 32 48
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 64 12
Ray Tracing Cores No 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 14-24 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 27-48 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.9-1.5 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 10 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size n/a 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort 1.4a 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
3 (75%)
1 (25%)
Total Votes: 4

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below