Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada vs Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada
71
out 100
VS
38
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada, vs Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Time Spy | 19774 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 77408 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 12622 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 48500 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 309.9 frames/s | 170.5 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 198.4 frames/s | 102.8 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 7.42 Gpix/sec | 3.25 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 9.94 Gpix/sec | 4.12 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 12.4 Gpix/sec | 4.06 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 2.02 Gpix/sec | 1.13 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1060 Gpix/sec | 353.4 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 31078.1 fps | 12273.1 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1142 | 1117 |
| DirectX 11 | 258 fps | 145 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 85 fps | 73 fps |
| GPU Compute | 16237 Ops/s | 8251 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 489.4 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 465.8 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 378.2 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 1434.1 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 1998.1 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 280.2 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenGL |
| OS | n/a | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 2002.3 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | August, 23, 2023 | February, 12, 2022 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Professional | Professional |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | AD103 | AD107 |
| Price | 2250 | 649 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2070 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2580 MHz | 2130 MHz |
| Shader Units | 7680 | 2816 |
| TMUs | 240 | 88 |
| ROPs | 80 | 48 |
| Execution Units | 60 | 22 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 88 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 48000 KB/core | 12000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 206 Gpix/sec | 102 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 619 GTex/s | 187 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 39.6 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 210 W | 70 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 379 mm² | 159 mm² |
| Transistor count | 45 billion | 18 billion |
| Transistor density | 118.73 MTr/mm² | 113.21 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 2250 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Bus | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 18000 MB/s | 16000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia RTX 4500 Ada the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
