AMD Radeon 840M vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 840M, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 840M and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a33
1080p Ultran/a24
1440p Ultran/a16
4K Ultran/a-
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spyn/a2781
Solar Bayn/a11162
Port Royaln/a1580
Fire Striken/a7824
Night Raidn/a33611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blurn/a86.4 frames/s
Face Detectionn/a35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detectionn/a1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detectionn/a1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blurn/a1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matchingn/a0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matchingn/a132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physicsn/a4470.7 fps
APIn/aOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Markn/a878
DirectX 11n/a67 fps
DirectX 12n/a31 fps
GPU Computen/a3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a183.4 fps
Car Chasen/a202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a161.6 fps
T-Rexn/a699.9 fps
ALU 2n/a849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a268.9 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 7, 2025 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 RDNA 3.0
Codename Krackan Point Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency n/a 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2900 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 256 768
TMUs 16 48
ROPs 8 32
Execution Units 4 12
Ray Tracing Cores 4 12
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 4 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15-54 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 4 nm 4 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below