AMD Radeon RX 580 vs Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
18
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon RX 580, vs Apple M4 GPU (10-Core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 76 38 33 15 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 52 40 23 13 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 78 56 37 16 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 58 49 34 17 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 33 23 20 10 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 47 41 27 15 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 33 24 16 9 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 30 27 13 n/a | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 60 51 31 18 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 52 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 39 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 26 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 13 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 4353 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 527 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 14979 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 56876 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 59.5 frames/s | 72.2 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 33.8 frames/s | 48.3 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 1.56 Gpix/sec | 1.4 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.1 Gpix/sec | 1.94 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 2.92 Gpix/sec | 1.5 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.33 Gpix/sec | 0.53 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 161.8 Gpix/sec | 123.3 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 5395.1 fps | 4938.4 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 767 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 60 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 43 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 3529 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 344.5 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 259.9 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 167.5 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 914.7 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 432.2 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 648.6 fps |
| API | n/a | Metal |
| OS | n/a | OS X |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | AMD | Apple |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | April, 18, 2017 | May, 7, 2024 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Professional |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Custom |
| Price | 229 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1257 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1340 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2304 | 1280 |
| TMUs | 144 | 80 |
| ROPs | 32 | 40 |
| Execution Units | n/a | 160 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | No | n/a |
| L1 cache | 16 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 43 Gpix/sec | 72 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 193 GTex/s | 144 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 6.2 TFLOPS | 4.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Custom |
| TGP | 185 W | 18 W |
| Process | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Max temperature | n/a | 100 °C |
| Transistor Size | 232 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 5 billion | 28 billion |
| Transistor density | 21.55 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 2000 MHz | 7500 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 8000 MB/s | 15000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
