AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
56
out 100
VS
80
out 100
Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 201 136 113 85 | 228 165 158 124 |
 The Witcher 3 | 198 179 128 67 | 241 218 152 83 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 289 202 145 79 | 310 225 168 86 |
 Far Cry 6 | 164 141 126 75 | 181 161 148 92 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 121 102 80 42 | 161 133 109 62 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 170 167 118 82 | 219 215 169 114 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 123 104 88 53 | 152 122 110 71 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 133 117 79 37 | 201 178 120 56 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 214 200 150 76 | 279 265 205 107 |
| 1080p High | 179 | 219 |
| 1080p Ultra | 150 | 187 |
| 1440p Ultra | 114 | 149 |
| 4K Ultra | 66 | 88 |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 20098 | 28302 |
| Solar Bay | 78368 | 138446 |
| Port Royal | 10855 | 18312 |
| Fire Strike | 49984 | 63725 |
| Night Raid | 158067 | 179276 |
| Background Blur | 300.7 frames/s | 279.5 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 200.5 frames/s | 220.1 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 5.77 Gpix/sec | 11 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 8.05 Gpix/sec | 15.2 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.44 Gpix/sec | 16.2 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.25 Gpix/sec | 2.08 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 566.4 Gpix/sec | 1370 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 20533.6 fps | 37199.7 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1167 | 1267 |
| DirectX 11 | 249 fps | 303 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 93 fps | 133 fps |
| GPU Compute | 13685 Ops/s | 19970 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 1300.3 fps | 1384.7 fps |
| Car Chase | 1191.7 fps | 1210.8 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 955.3 fps | 998.7 fps |
| T-Rex | 3854.1 fps | 5172 fps |
| ALU 2 | 6542.4 fps | 9885.2 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 284.8 fps | 282.1 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 5363.2 | 9573.9 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | AMD | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | September, 6, 2023 | January, 31, 2024 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | High-end | High-end |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | Navi 32 | AD103 |
| Price | 499 | 999 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1295 MHz | 2295 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2430 MHz | 2550 MHz |
| Shader Units | 3840 | 10240 |
| TMUs | 240 | 320 |
| ROPs | 96 | 112 |
| Execution Units | n/a | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | n/a | 320 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 4000 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 4 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 233 Gpix/sec | 286 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 583 GTex/s | 816 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 37.3 TFLOPS | 52.2 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 263 W | 320 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 346 mm² | 379 mm² |
| Transistor count | 28 billion | 45 billion |
| Transistor density | 80.92 MTr/mm² | 118.73 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 2438 MHz | 1438 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 19500 MB/s | 23000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | n/a | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
