Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) vs MSI Cyborg 17
Compared 2 laptops: Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025), vs MSI Cyborg 17. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Versions
| Processor | - Intel Core i7 14650HX - Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX |
- Intel Core 5 210H - Intel Core 7 240H - Intel Core 9 270H |
| Storage | - 512 GB - 1024 GB - 2048 GB |
- 512 GB - 1024 GB - 2048 GB |
| RAM | - 16 GB - 24 GB - 32 GB - 64 GB |
- 16 GB - 32 GB - 64 GB - 96 GB |
Review
System Performance
System and app performance
Gaming Performance
Graphics in popular 3D games
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Battery Life
Estimated real-world battery life
Connectivity
Ports, webcam, and interfaces
Case & Design
Appearance, materials, durability, comfort
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBody
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Pixel size | 354x269x17.9-27.3 mm | 399.3x258x21.2-22.2 mm |
| Area | 952 cm² | 1030 cm² |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.1 % | 80.1 % |
| Side bezels | 0.1 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Material | - Top: Aluminum - Middle: Plastic - Bottom: Plastic |
Plastic |
| Transformer | No | No |
| Cooling type | Active | Active |
| Vapor chamber | No | No |
| Liquid metal | No | No |
| Cooler count | 2 | n/a |
Display
| Diagonal | 16 in | 17.3 in |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 pixels | 1920x1080 pixels |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Sync Tech | G-Sync | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Coating | Matte | Matte |
| Light sensor | No | No |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| Adobe RGB gamut | 75.3 % | n/a |
Battery
| Capacity | 90 Wh | 55.2 Wh |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
| USB PD | Yes, 100 W | Yes |
| Charge Port Location | Left | Right |
| Charge Power | 280 W | 120 W |
Processor
| Processor | Intel Core i7 14650HX | Intel Core 5 210H |
| Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Cores | 16 (8P + 8E) | 8 (4P + 4E) |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB | 12 MB |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48EU) |
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 10 nm |
GPU Model
| GPU Model | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB |
| TGP | 115 W | 45 W |
| Nvidia Optimus | MUX | Yes, Advanced Optimus |
| Graphics Type | Discrete | Discrete |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| FLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS | 8.6 TFLOPS |
| Video Memory | 8 | 8 |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Tire Width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory speed | 28 Gbit/s | 24 Gbit/s |
| Shader Units | 3328 | 2560 |
| TMUs | 104 | 80 |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
RAM
| RAM Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Channels | 2x8 GB | 2x8 GB |
| Frequency | 5600 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Replaceable | Yes | Yes |
| Total Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Max RAM | 32 | 96 |
Storage
| Bus | PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) | PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) |
| Type | SSD (M2) | SSD (M2) |
| Channels | 1x512 GB | 1x512 GB |
| Replaceable | Yes | Yes |
| Total Slots | 2 | 1 |
| NVMe | Yes | Yes |
| Storage Capacity | 512 GB | 512 GB |
Sound
| Audio Formats | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Speaker Power | 2x2 W | 2x2 W |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
| Microphones | 2 | 2 |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | v6E | v6E |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
| IR sensor | Yes | No |
| CD drive | No | No |
| Webcam | Above Display | Above Display |
| Webcam Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| USB-A | 3x3.2 | 2x3.2 |
| USB-C | 2x3.2 | 1x3.2 |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | No |
| HDMI | 1x2.1 | 1x2.1 |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| VGA | No | No |
| 3.5 mm Audio Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (RJ45) | Yes | Yes |
| Card Reader | No | No |
| Charging Port | Yes | Yes |
Keyboard & Touchpad
| Key Type | Island Layout | Island Layout |
| Numeric Keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Backlight | Yes | Yes |
| Key Travel | 1.7 mm | n/a |
| Surface | Plastic | Plastic |
| Windows Precision | Yes | Yes |
*
Attention!
Ports, display type, speakers, and specs may differ by model or country.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2