Cubot Max 5 vs Infinix Hot 30 Play NFC
Compared 2 smartphones : Cubot Max 5 Manufactured in July, 2024, with display 6.95 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200, vs Infinix Hot 30 Play NFC, Manufactured in May, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G37. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Cubot Max 5
- Larger display: 6.95in
- Higher pixel density: 387ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 30 Play NFC
- Lighter design: 205g vs 223g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5100mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | 12/256 GB | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.95 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2 % | 85 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 173.9 mm (6.85 in) | 170.57 mm (6.72 in) |
| Width | 78.9 mm (3.11 in) | 77.5 mm (3.05 in) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 in) | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 223 g (7.87 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- White - Black - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | MediaTek Helio G37 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex A55) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 580 | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G610 MP6 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1442 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1241 | 197 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3810 | 881 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 4716 | 34 |
| CPU | 242170 | 54012 |
| GPU | 222177 | 18177 |
| Memory | 186614 | 40689 |
| UX | 197896 | 41802 |
| NanoReview Score | 848857 | 154680 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | n/a | XOS 12.6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5100 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (78% in 120 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 4:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 100 MP | 16 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 100 MP Macro: 5 MP |
Standard: 16 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 100 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OVA0B40 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.8 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX616 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM B2|3|5|8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | July, 2024 yr | May, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2024 yr | May, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 265 | 125 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Cubot Max 5 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0