Cubot Max 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G

Compared 2 smartphones : Cubot Max 5 Manufactured in July, 2024, with display 6.95 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200, vs Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G, Manufactured in June, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G91 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Cubot Max 5
  • Larger display: 6.95in
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 5030mAh
  • Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
  • Higher pixel density: 396ppi
  • Lighter design: 205g vs 223g
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options 12/256 GB - 6/128 GB
- 6/256 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Cubot Max 5 and Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 6.95 in 6.79 in
Resolution 1080x2460 pixels 1080x2460 pixels
Aspect ratio 21:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 387 ppi 396 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate n/a Yes (36-90 Hz)
Max brightness 500 nits 550 nits
HDR support No No
Screen-to-body ratio 82.2 % 88 %
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Cubot Max 5
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
448 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 173.9 mm (6.85 in) 168.6 mm (6.64 in)
Width 78.9 mm (3.11 in) 76.28 mm (3 in)
Thickness 9.2 mm (0.36 in) 8.3 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 223 g (7.87 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Water resistance No IP53
Back panel Plastic Glass
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Black
- Blue
- Pink
- Yellow
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Cubot Max 5
82.2 %
Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
88 %

Performance

Testing Cubot Max 5 and Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8200 MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra
Max Frequency 3100 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex A55)
- 3/3 (Cortex A78)
- 1/3.1 (Cortex A78)
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2 (Cortex-A75)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 580 MediaTek APU
Graphics Mali-G610 MP6 Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Cores 768 48
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 1442 GFLOPS 96 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Cubot Max 5
1241
Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
430
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cubot Max 5
3810
Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
1369
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1241430
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)38101369
Geekbench Compute (GPU)4716n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Cubot Max 5
848857
Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
277388
CPU24217088268
GPU22217737622
Memory18661469807
UX19789681691
NanoReview Score848857277388

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB - 6 GB
- 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 1800 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB- 128 GB
- 256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 Android 14
OS Size n/a 18 GB
UI Skin n/a HyperOS 1.0

Battery

Volume 5100 mAh 5030 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 33 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes (42% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:00 h 1:17 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Cubot Max 5
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
21:38
Web Browsingn/a06:21 h
Video Playbackn/a13:07 h
Gamesn/a04:19 h
Standby Moden/a125 h

Main camera

Matrix 100 MP 108 MP
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 120 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 100 MP
Macro: 5 MP
Standard: 108 MP
Macro: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix100 MP108 MP
Aperturef/1.9f/1.8
SensorOmnivision OVA0B40n/a
Sensor size1/1.81/1.67
Pixel size0.61 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.5
Sensor Sony IMX616 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.8 n/a
Pixel size 0.8 μm n/a
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Varies by region
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoYes
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHzGSM 2/3/5/8
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19WCDMA 1/5/8
LTE Bands*LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71)LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41)
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio n/a Yes
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced July, 2024 yr June, 2024 yr
Release Date July, 2024 yr June, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 265 199
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 33 W n/a
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Cubot Max 5 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below