Google Pixel 4 XL vs Vivo X200 FE
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 4 XL Manufactured in November, 2019, with display 6.3 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855, vs Vivo X200 FE, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 4 XL
- Higher pixel density: 537ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 FE
- Larger display: 6.31in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 186g vs 193g
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 3700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.3 in | 6.31 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3040 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 537 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.9 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 367 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.4 mm (6.31 in) | 150.8 mm (5.94 in) |
| Width | 75.1 mm (2.96 in) | 71.8 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Orange |
- Black - Blue - Pink - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 690 | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | Adreno 640 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 585 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 898.5 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 870 | 2209 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2493 | 7239 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 15299 |
| CPU | 191412 | 645427 |
| GPU | 188469 | 652697 |
| Memory | 102131 | 382399 |
| UX | 146742 | 366339 |
| NanoReview Score | 628754 | 2046862 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 39.5 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 82 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 18 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3013 | n/a |
| Writing score | 13323 | n/a |
| Web score | 7313 | n/a |
| Video editing | 7063 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 8875 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 10849 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | n/a | Funtouch 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 3700 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (11 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (45% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 19 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | 0:57 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:06 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 09:35 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:10 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 83 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 122 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12.2 MP Telephoto: 16 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 122 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 28 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX363 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 45 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX481 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.09 | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX481 | Samsung S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.09 | 1/3.44 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 / 5200 / 3500 / 600 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B600/B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600/B3500/B5200) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2019 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 650 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0