Google Pixel 4 XL vs Vivo X200 FE

Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 4 XL Manufactured in November, 2019, with display 6.3 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855, vs Vivo X200 FE, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 4 XL
  • Higher pixel density: 537ppi
  • Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 FE
  • Larger display: 6.31in
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Lighter design: 186g vs 193g
  • Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 3700mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Fingerprint scanner

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/64 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Google Pixel 4 XL and Vivo X200 FE
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.3 in 6.31 in
Resolution 1440x3040 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 537 ppi 461 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 450 nits n/a
HDR support Yes HDR10 Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 82.2 % 90.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Google Pixel 4 XL
555 nits
Vivo X200 FE
n/a
sRGB gamut99.9 %n/a
PWM (Flicker)367 Hzn/a
Response time3.4 msn/a
Contrast∞ Infiniten/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.4 mm (6.31 in) 150.8 mm (5.94 in)
Width 75.1 mm (2.96 in) 71.8 mm (2.83 in)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 in) 8 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 193 g (6.81 oz) 186 g (6.56 oz)
Water resistance IP68 IP69
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Glass Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Orange
- Black
- Blue
- Pink
- Yellow
Fingerprint sensor No Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Google Pixel 4 XL
82.2 %
Vivo X200 FE
90.3 %

Performance

Testing Google Pixel 4 XL and Vivo X200 FE In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
Max Frequency 2840 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver))
- 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold))
- 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold))
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 7 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon 690 MediaTek NPU 790
Graphics Adreno 640 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 768 1536
GPU Frequency 585 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS 898.5 GFLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Google Pixel 4 XL
870
Vivo X200 FE
2209
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Google Pixel 4 XL
2493
Vivo X200 FE
7239
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)8702209
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)24937239
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a15299
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Google Pixel 4 XL
628754
Vivo X200 FE
2046862
CPU191412645427
GPU188469652697
Memory102131382399
UX146742366339
NanoReview Score6287542046862
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Google Pixel 4 XL
3013
Vivo X200 FE
n/a
Max Surface Temp.39.5 °Cn/a
Stability82 %n/a
Graphics Test18 fpsn/a
Graphics Score3013n/a
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Google Pixel 4 XL
10849
Vivo X200 FE
n/a
Writing score13323n/a
Web score7313n/a
Video editing7063n/a
Data manipulation8875n/a
NanoReview Score10849n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 64 GB
- 128 GB
256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 13) Android 15
OS Size 13 GB n/a
UI Skin n/a Funtouch 15

Battery

Volume 3700 mAh 6500 mAh
Max Charging Power 18 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (11 W) No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (45% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 19 min)
Full Charge Time 1:20 h 0:57 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Google Pixel 4 XL
16:18
Vivo X200 FE
n/a
Web Browsing06:06 hn/a
Video Playback09:35 hn/a
Games04:10 hn/a
Standby Mode83 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 122 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 4000x3000 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 3x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (720p) 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° 119 °
Lenses count Standard: 12.2 MP
Telephoto: 16 MP
Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix122 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Focal length28 mm23 mm
SensorSony IMX363Sony IMX921
Sensor size1/2.551/1.56
Pixel size1.4 μm1 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocus (Dual Pixel)Laser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix16 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.4f/2.6
Focal length45 mm70 mm
SensorSony IMX481Sony IMX882
Sensor size1/3.091/1.95
Pixel size1 μm0.8 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a8 MP
Aperturen/af/2.2
Sensor sizen/a1/4.0
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 3264x2448 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 22 mm n/a
Sensor Sony IMX481 Samsung S5KKD1
Sensor size 1/3.09 1/3.44
Pixel size 1.22 μm 0.7 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.4
Bluetooth features LE, A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 / 5200 / 3500 / 600GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G BandsUMTS 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*LTE (B600/B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600/B3500/B5200)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)
LTE category18n/a
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Google Pixel 4 XL
84.3 dB
Vivo X200 FE
n/a

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced October, 2019 yr June, 2025 yr
Release Date November, 2019 yr July, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 899 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 650
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Face Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 18 W Yes 90 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 FE the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below