Google Pixel 5 vs Vivo X300
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 5 Manufactured in October, 2020, with display 6 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 765G, vs Vivo X300, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 5
- Lighter design: 151g vs 190g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300
- Larger display: 6.31in
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6040mAh vs 4080mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/128 GB | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6 in | 6.31 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 432 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 97.4 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 367 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 5 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 144.7 mm (5.7 in) | 150.57 mm (5.93 in) |
| Width | 70.4 mm (2.77 in) | 71.92 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.95 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 151 g (5.33 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Metal | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Green |
- Black - Blue - Red - Pink - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 1 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 1/2.2 (Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)) - 1/2.4 (Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 696 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 620 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 384 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 576 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 765 | 3383 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1944 | 10099 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25462 |
| CPU | 145746 | 957632 |
| GPU | 36336 | 1342611 |
| Memory | 85253 | 448412 |
| UX | 120703 | 618759 |
| NanoReview Score | 388038 | 3367414 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 38.6 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 89 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1084 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 16.6 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4080 mAh | 6040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (12 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (30% in 30 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:45 h | 0:46 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:33 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:33 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:59 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 98 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 122 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4290x2800 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 107 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12.2 MP Ultra-wide: 16 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 122 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.68 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX363 | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-602 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX481 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.09 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 60 | n/a |
| Preview | 58 | n/a |
| Zoom | 71 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 15 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2020 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2020 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 700 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 699 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0