Google Pixel 6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 6 Pro Manufactured in October, 2021, with display 6.7 with chipsetGoogle Tensor, vs Vivo X300 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 512ppi
- Lighter design: 210g vs 226g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher battery capacity: 6510mAh vs 5003mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.9 mm (6.45 in) | 161.98 mm (6.38 in) |
| Width | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) | 75.48 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Yellow |
- White - Black - Blue - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex A55) - 2/2.25 (Cortex A76) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-X1) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Tensor Processing Unit | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G78 MP20 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 1280 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 848 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2170.9 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1331 | 3447 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3078 | 10378 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25723 |
| CPU | 245121 | 1043247 |
| GPU | 306201 | 1510982 |
| Memory | 171401 | 667254 |
| UX | 207450 | 790449 |
| NanoReview Score | 930173 | 4011932 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 40.4 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 56 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 37 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 6207 | n/a |
| Writing score | 16562 | n/a |
| Web score | 8739 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6925 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 11190 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 11580 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 14 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5003 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (23 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:59 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:56 h | 08:45 h |
| Video Playback | 10:55 h | 14:55 h |
| Games | 04:56 h | 06:08 h |
| Standby Mode | 94 h | 81 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 4x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 114 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GN1 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 104 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX586 | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX386 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.25 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 111 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3840x2880 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+ 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2021 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2021 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 900 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0