Google Pixel 7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 7 Pro Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G2, vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus, Manufactured in March, 2019with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 9820. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
- Higher pixel density: 522ppi
- Lighter design: 175g vs 212g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.4 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 pixels | 1440x3040 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19:9 |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 522 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3 % | 87.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 97 % | 96.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 240 Hz | 235 Hz |
| Response time | 4 ms | 4.8 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) | 157.6 mm (6.2 in) |
| Width | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) | 74.1 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray |
- Black - Blue - Green - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9820 |
| Max Frequency | 2850 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.31 (Cortex-A75) - 2/2.73 (Mongoose M4) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Neural Processor | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G710 MP7 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 672 | 432 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1142.4 GFLOPS | 607 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1404 | 947 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3368 | 2460 |
| CPU | 241450 | 165023 |
| GPU | 297846 | 197322 |
| Memory | 185192 | 120939 |
| UX | 214960 | 154911 |
| NanoReview Score | 939448 | 638195 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.9 °C | 42.5 °C |
| Stability | 71 % | 82 % |
| Graphics Test | 38 fps | 19 fps |
| Graphics Score | 6383 | 3230 |
| Writing score | 16136 | 10100 |
| Web score | 9151 | 6612 |
| Video editing | 6755 | 5772 |
| Data manipulation | 10868 | 6847 |
| NanoReview Score | 11564 | 8595 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 128 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | 14 GB | 46.5 GB |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | One UI 4.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 23 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (23 W) | Yes Qi/PMA (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (46% in 30 min) | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:49 h | 1:40 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:06 h | 05:58 h |
| Video Playback | 12:49 h | 11:15 h |
| Games | 04:48 h | 04:15 h |
| Standby Mode | 83 h | 80 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 126 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 16 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 - 2.4 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GN1 | Samsung SAK2L4 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 120 mm | 52 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | Samsung S5K3M3 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/3.6 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX381 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 1.25 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 74 | n/a |
| Zoom | 143 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 10 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2736 pixels | 4320x2432 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.65 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | February, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2022 yr | March, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | 1000 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Pixel 7 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0