Google Pixel 7 vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 7 Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 6.3 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G2, vs Oppo Find X9 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 7
- Lighter design: 197g vs 224g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 4355mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.3 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1264x2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 416 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 155.6 mm (6.13 in) | 161.26 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 73.2 mm (2.88 in) | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Yellow |
- White - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G2 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2850 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G710 MP7 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 672 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1142.4 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1370 | 3235 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3202 | 9626 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 29534 |
| CPU | 256594 | 1030180 |
| GPU | 315697 | 1453877 |
| Memory | 168964 | 709892 |
| UX | 194845 | 762936 |
| NanoReview Score | 936100 | 3956885 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.8 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 71 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 39 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 6523 | n/a |
| Writing score | 15448 | n/a |
| Web score | 7606 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6295 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 10366 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 10701 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 14 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4355 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 20 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (20 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:40 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:58 h | 19:04 h |
| Video Playback | 13:42 h | 25:00 h |
| Games | 05:14 h | 10:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 82 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 114 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GN1 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX381 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.25 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 72 | n/a |
| Zoom | 106 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2736 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 599 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0