Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Oppo A98
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 9 Pro Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.3 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G4, vs Oppo A98, Manufactured in May, 2023 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 9 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 495ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Oppo A98
- Larger display: 6.72in
- Lighter design: 192g vs 199g
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4700mAh
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 16/128 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 6.3 in | 6.72 in |
| Resolution | 1280x2856 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 495 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 680 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1 % | 86.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 99.1 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 2 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 152.8 mm (6.02 in) | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 72 mm (2.83 in) | 76.1 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Pink |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.92 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.1 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G715 MP7 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 896 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1792 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2002 | 904 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4710 | 2115 |
| CPU | 283910 | 148338 |
| GPU | 447101 | 83427 |
| Memory | 183290 | 98664 |
| UX | 211054 | 120107 |
| NanoReview Score | 1125355 | 450536 |
| Writing score | n/a | 13148 |
| Web score | n/a | 9089 |
| Video editing | n/a | 3912 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7965 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 9483 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 28.8 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | ColorOS 13.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 27 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (12 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (56% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 18 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:24 h | 0:44 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:12 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:40 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:23 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 96 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | 9000x7000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GNK | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 48 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | n/a |
| Focal length | 113 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 48 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 42 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2736 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM/EDGE Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | May, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | May, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 999 | 320 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Pixel 9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0